<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Girl in a Party Hat &#187; candy as reward</title>
	<atom:link href="http://girlinapartyhat.com/index.php/tag/candy-as-reward/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://girlinapartyhat.com</link>
	<description>Girl in a Party Hat</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 May 2022 19:26:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.40</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>The Melt-in-Your-Hand IEP</title>
		<link>http://girlinapartyhat.com/index.php/2010/04/the-iep-that-melted-in-my-hand/</link>
		<comments>http://girlinapartyhat.com/index.php/2010/04/the-iep-that-melted-in-my-hand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 19:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amysilverman]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Down syndrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[candy as reward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://girlinapartyhat.com/?p=2445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sophie&#8217;s IEP meeting was last week, and we&#8217;re still in the throes of finalizing/reviewing/sign-seal-and-delivering, but things seem to be falling into place. It&#8217;s such a detailed process, designed to address every possible angle of your kid and her needs, but really what I find is that it lulls you (or me, anyway) into a false [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sophie&#8217;s IEP meeting was <a href="http://girlinapartyhat.com/index.php/2010/04/no-day-but-today/">last week</a>, and we&#8217;re still in the throes of finalizing/reviewing/sign-seal-and-delivering, but things seem to be falling into place.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s such a detailed process, designed to address every possible angle of your kid and her needs, but really what I find is that it lulls you (or me, anyway) into a false sense of security.</p>
<p>Consider the following.</p>
<p>The meeting was Friday. Monday (ok, it might have been Tuesday) evening we were winding down, discussing the day&#8217;s highlights, and Sophie informed me that she had eaten some M&amp;Ms.</p>
<p>&#8220;Yum yum!&#8221; she announced, pantomiming the act of the gobble. I was curious.</p>
<p>&#8220;Where&#8217;d you get those?&#8221;</p>
<p>She mentioned the name of the special ed teacher at school. Upon further discussion, it became clear that Sophie had behaved well during a session, and was rewarded with what I&#8217;m guessing was one or two M&amp;Ms.</p>
<p>Really, no big deal. Except that we spent a long time in that IEP meeting just days before talking about various reward systems &#8212; that the Elmo chart (which became a Christmas chart, then a Foofa from Yo Gabba Gabba chart) had fallen by the wayside, that sometimes it worked to hold onto Sophie&#8217;s favorite self-soothing paintbrush during a session and give it to her at the end in honor of a job well done.</p>
<p>No one mentioned M&amp;Ms. I&#8217;m sure that&#8217;s because there are all sorts of food rules at school these days. I&#8217;m all in favor of that. If I&#8217;m going to let my kid have junk food, I want to be in control of it. That said, I really don&#8217;t care about occasional treats. (This is a whole other discussion for another day, but I think it&#8217;s a bad idea to never let your kid have treats; it only makes her obsessed with getting them. I should know.)</p>
<p>But not as a reward for good behavior. Not from the special ed teacher, who of all people has been trained (I thought) to come up with better methods to ensure good behavior.</p>
<p>And not, for crying out loud, for a kid with Down syndrome. Sophie&#8217;s pretty lithe at the moment, but I&#8217;d like to keep it that way, and sadly, she&#8217;s genetically programmed for plumpness.</p>
<p>Most of all, I was annoyed at the timing &#8212; that Sophie mentioned the M&amp;M thing just days after the IEP meeting. A good reminder, I suppose, that an IEP is pretty much worth the paper it&#8217;s printed on.</p>
<p>I do love Sophie&#8217;s teacher, Ms. Y; she  has quite a way with words. When I mentioned the M&amp;M thing in an email, she responded that &#8220;non-culinary&#8221; reward options would immediately be explored.</p>
<p>In fact, the special ed teacher reported yesterday, that will be written into the IEP.</p>
<p>Great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://girlinapartyhat.com/index.php/2010/04/the-iep-that-melted-in-my-hand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
